Curtiss P-40E of 343rd Fighter Goup, 11th Fighter Squadron

The Hasegawa kit is rather basic in terms of parts, but the panel lines are finely recessed, the surface detail is good, and the details sufficient. Oddly enough, the landing gear can only be completed as lowered. The decals are really good, though, and so is the fit. It was a fun and fast build that was displayed in a little vignette with some Airfix USAAF ground crew. The Airfix figures are, of course, made out of polystyrene, so they are difficult to clean up, and details are lacking

This P-40E is wearing the markings of the 11th Fighter Squadron of the 343rd Fighter Group which fought against the Japanese above the Aleutian Islands in western Alaska between 1942 and 1943. The Aleutian tiger nose art was characteristic of the entire group, and there were other similarities between this unit and the more famous Brothers-in-arms of the "Flying Tigers": the commanding officer of the group was Claire Chennault's son! A very interesting combat diary of the 54th Fighter Squadron, another unit of the 343rd can be found here: https://www.nps.gov/aleu/learn/photosmultimedia/upload/54th-FS-history-all-pgs.pdf

Convair F-102A Delta Dagger, California Air National Guard

High-performance jets of the 1950s and 1960s have a certain charm. It was the era of faster and higher, of a Few Good Men, and of everlasting technological optimism. The Convair F-102 was part of that era, being a supersonic interceptor meant to be guided by Air-Ground Intercept (AGI) to shoot down Soviet bombers before they dropped their nuclear payloads over American cities. This kit featured the markings of the California Air National Guard's 194th Fighter Squadron. They flew F-102A Delta Daggers from July 1, 1964, having replaced the old F-86Ls with the all-missile Mach 1,25 interceptor. The Delta Daggers were in turn retired on January 1, 1984 and replaced by F-4D Phantom IIs.

It seems as if this kit was released just before recessed panel lines became the norm. The raised lines are subtle, and yet they convey the image of this interceptor. There are several quirks, though: the fin has a third of its plastic presence on the left hull and roughly two thirds on the right side, which means that careful fitting, filling and sanding is required. The tail decal fortunately covers up much of this. The lower wings are also fitted behind the front leading edge of the upper wing, and this requires careful fitting. Although I chose to display the model in flight, the landing gear can be improved. The pilot is underscale or just representing a rather diminutive aviator..The Falcon missiles are crude, although resin replacements can be purchased. Finally, all online sources warned against assembling a closed missile bay. There are insertable closed missile bays available in resin, but I opted for an ascending Dagger, ready to pounce on Soviet strategic aviation approaching the West Coast. On the Bright side, other aspects of the fit are quite good. The cockpit is rather decent for a late 1960s/early 1970s kit, and there are decals to further highlight the instrument panels. The decals were still quite useable, and the canopy was reasonably clear. Above all, great fun was had from a kit that cost roughly $10 at Hobbybokhandeln in Stockholm, a really good used model shop and book store.